FilmsNewsAboutScreeningsPublicationsContact
placeholder image
image

Muezzin

From 2944 mosques Istanbul’s muezzins call the people to prayer five times a day. Once a year, the best among them is determined in a nationwide contest. Muezzin follows the course of the competition along a handful of participants. One repeatedly hears the variations and interpretations of a chant, reminder of the duty of prayer. A tradition becomes visible in which religious and competitive spirit, the search for a voice are worked through performatively year after year as a vanity fair in an exclusively male universe.



Country, year
Austria, 2009
Runtime
85 min
Writer, director
Sebastian Brameshuber
Cinematography
Govinda Van Maele
Sebastian Brameshuber
Editors
Sebastian Brameshuber
Gökçe İnce
Sound, sound design, re-recording mix
Marco Zinz
Production manager
David Bohun
Marie Tappero
Producers
Sebastian Brameshuber
Gabriele Kranzelbinder
David Bohun
KPG Kranzelbinder Gabriele Production
Film format
HDV 1:1,77
Screening format
HDCam
Digibeta
1:1,77
Dolby 5.1
Supported by
ÖFI
ORF
FFW
MA7 Wien
Kultur Land Salzburg
BMEIA
Linz Kulturhauptstadt 2009
ÖKF Istanbul
Berlinale Talent Campus Doc Station 2008
Austrian release date
June 18, 2010
World premiere
Karlovy Vary International Film Festival 2009
TV acquisitions
ARTE (France/Germany)
NHK (Japan)
NTR (Netherlands)
TV3 (Catalonia)
UR (Sweden)
ORF (Austria)
Al Jazeera
Festivals (selection)
Karlovy Vary International Film Festival 2009
Crossing Europe Film Festival, Linz 2009 (Opening Film)
Sarajevo Film Festival 2009
DokuFest Prizren 2009
Istanbul International Film Festival 2010
Dokumentarfilmwoche Hamburg 2010 (Opening Film)
BAFICI Buenos Aires 2010
FID Marseille 2010
BELDOCS, Belgrade 2010
SANFIC, Santiago de Chile 2010
SIEFF Sardinia, Nuoro 2010
Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Film Festival 2010
Fajr International Film Festival, Teheran 2011
Awards
Open Eyes Award, MedFilm Festival, Rome 2010

Of the Profane and the Sacred

The distant barking of a dog, screeching seagulls, a crying baby—various sounds penetrate the nocturnal silence but are not able to awaken the sleeping metropolis. They accompany a man in a suit who is on his way at daybreak, the rhythmic clacking of his heels on the asphalt of deserted alleys, until he reaches a building. Keys rattle, chains, the beeping of an alarm system is deactivated, hinges squeak. A cumbersome gate is opened; behind it lies a long corridor, a room immersed in darkness. This invisible, indiscernible and in a certain sense abstract place evokes a mysterious atmosphere. Then the first light is switched on and we see the man in the middle of a small room. Following a cut to an almost black screen, a transformation finally takes place by means of illumination: successively, magnificent chandeliers and lamps light up, providing a view of a hall-like room lined with a precious carpet that shines in light and splendor—the interior of a mosque. A panning long shot of the quiet city from above testifies that there are still no visible signs of day, while a huge loudspeaker almost threateningly occupies the foreground of the picture. After eating a spoonful of honey, the man carefully puts on his taqiyah (skullcap) and goes outside, where the silence gradually yields to the chirping of birds and distant chanting. The man walks through a door, climbs up a staircase and steps up to a microphone in a narrow space. He pauses briefly with concentration, then places his hands over his ears and starts to sing with devotion. An emphatic call to prayer rings out as dawn breaks over the roofs of Istanbul. While young men begin their daily work on the streets, the city turns into an echo chamber in which the singing of several thousand muezzins resonates.

Muezzin, Sebastian Brameshuber’s first feature-length documentary, accompanies prayer callers during their preparations for and the holding of the Call to Prayer Competition, which promises the winner high esteem and prestigious work in the major mosques. The filmmaker doesn’t use the dramaturgical arc of the contest in the sense of a suspenseful narrative; rather, it serves him as a vehicle to approach the art of intonation and to gain unknown insights into the everyday life of the Muslim men whose voices call the faithful to prayer five times a day. Brameshuber already condenses the essence of his cinematic approach in the exposition described above. It is the visualization of contrasts that inscribe themselves as constants in Muezzin as well as the interaction of seemingly irreconcilable opposites: for example, in the transition from night to day, from darkness to light, from silence to singing, from urban space to sacred prayer hall.

The bustle of the awakening city, through which flows of traffic and tourists gradually weave their way, at first seems to be unaffected by the religious microcosms that nevertheless permeate it and also temporally structure it. Even so, the film reveals interferences between the profane and the sacred during almost every moment. These interferences are not only present between the living environments of Turkish society and the muezzins, but also characterize the everyday lives and personalities of the subjects themselves: Their profession is both a vocation and an occupation. The prayer callers perform their work not as Muslim clerics, but as employees of the state. Their voice is their asset and requires perfection—“the best singing for the best religion”—which the apparently gifted have not simply been born with. They must study this art form and persistently practice their craft between the actual spiritual moments of the Muslim call to prayer, the so-called adhān—in other words, a constant oscillating between spirituality and pragmatism. This becomes evident, not least, in the fact that Brameshuber doesn’t merely focus on the men in their function as muezzins but also shows them in various social roles: as father or teacher figures, as pupils, as patriarchal heads of families, as members of a religious community, and as opponents. In these various contexts, the men’s devotion to Allah gives way to the earthly fight for fame and fortune—the parallel depiction of the muezzins’ competition with a TV show for the best Turkish pop act proves to be quite adequate. Deliberate sublimity turns into arrogant showing-off, or the sacred art form is suddenly declared a sin, for instance, when the daughter of one of the film’s protagonists wants to turn her musical passion into a profession.

In the film, the spiritual aspects and meanings of adhān are communicated only sparsely through verbal descriptions. It is the prayer calls themselves, the performances before the jury of the competition and the intoned appeals from the minaret through which this knowledge is conveyed—as a feeling, as an experience that becomes possible only through the art form itself. In Muezzin, Brameshuber adopts the characteristic aspect of art to evoke experience. He dispenses with explanatory commentaries to allow the protagonists and, above all, the language of the film to express themselves. Alternating between truth and artistic poetry, this poetic documentary film assembles various, sometimes contradictory, facets of its main characters’ lives and personalities to form a mosaic-like and complex picture, not only of the muezzins portrayed, but of an important (sub)culture of Muslim society. A picture that doesn’t so much confirm clichés as provoke a revision of simple attributions.

From Bilder, Falten (Le Studio Edition 1)

Michelle Koch

“An Austrian documentary film was one of the public favourites at the 29th International Istanbul Film Festival. Brameshuber’s skilful montage, which is affectionate toward his protagonists, sometimes gives us a glimpse of their darker sides. The fact that he does not roll them up and thus avoids clichés, but instead concentrates on the singing contest, enhances the coherence and originality of this beautiful documentary.”

RAY, issue 05/2010

“One wishes for more such documentaries and the wish is immediately fulfilled in one of the late screenings: Muezzin by Sebastian Brameshuber. The film first seduces or abducts to the awakening Istanbul, in beautiful, calm pictures, then climbs up to the minaret with a muezzin and so the story begins.”

Schnitt Film Magazin, 2010
1/5
Excerpt from the interview “A Distrust of Myself, of the Other Within Myself” — P. 3
by Alejandro Bachmann
(AB)

Could you expand on this notion a little bit with regard to your documentaries? One could also read your documentary work as follows: Muezzin is a movie about a traditional practice and its transfer into a contemporary logic of competition, And There We Are, in the Middle is a movie about the traces of a former concentration camp in the present day, specifically in the lives of young people in Ebensee, and Movements of a Nearby Mountain is a movie about the persistence of a myth and the never-ending cycle of scrap metal, of the auto industry, of global trade. Seen from this perspective, your work could also be interpreted as an exploration of what persists, what survives, what perseveres. How, in your opinion, does the element of volatility factor into all this?

(SB)

My impression is that there cannot be one without the other. If I’m interested in what persists, fleeting things are all around me. Documentary work originates from this ambivalence—the desire to film a fleeting moment in order to (ostensibly) transform it into something permanent. The Islamic call to prayer is a fleeting thing, because faith commands that it always and exclusively be performed live (exceptions, as it were, prove the rule). At the same time, in theory, this call to prayer never ends, because the starting times are clearly defined each day anew, at dawn, which is why the muezzin in Istanbul starts his call a little earlier than the one in Sofia, than the one in Sarajevo, than the one in Vienna—and whenever the muezzin in Baku calls to morning prayer, it’s almost time for the one in Istanbul to rise and shine again. This seems to me like a community’s self-assurance that the world be kept spinning and not thrown out of joint. Metaphorically speaking, the call to prayer is an elastic band holding together the seconds, minutes, hours, days, and, beyond time, space. I think rituals—which is to say, acts repeated regularly with more or less sacred gravitas (even something as banal as using the espresso maker every morning)—are strategies humans concoct to come to terms with volatility and finitude and, ultimately, to get a sense of self-assurance.

(AB)

In your films you stage certain processes and procedures with great affection that are specifically carried out by individuals: The muezzin walks briskly to the mosque at night, prepares, climbs the minaret, concentrates, starts to sing—and then the film cuts to a wide shot of the Istanbul cityscape. The singing contracts time and space, as you say, and coincidentally the film does the same. Muezzins in Istanbul, teenagers in Ebensee living in a place entangled in its own past, Cliff, whose work moves Austria closer to Nigeria. How would you position these people in relation to yourself, a man from Upper Austria living in Vienna, who studied in Vienna and France? Or, to rephrase the question, is it easier to recognize these connections between individuals and society, history, and myths outside of one’s own context—crudely put, “in the Other”?

(SB)

Working in documentary, to me, means exploring “the Other” in one way or another. If I were to make a cinematic self-portrait, this process would include distancing myself from myself so that I could ultimately look at myself as an “Other.” You distance yourself into a “safe range” step by step, a range at which an analytical perspective becomes possible: at first by putting your idea to paper, then in the process of filming, again in the cutting room, and finally of course by watching the film in the theater. The audience also inevitably looks at the “Other” first; this is already dictated by the apparatus that is cinema. Ideally, at some point, the moment sets in when you recognize yourself, aspects of your own life, your own existence, in it. After all, the dialectic between the Self and the Other is where our entire (social) life takes place. Creating a distance as well as creating a closeness are central strategies of documentary filmmaking. I would say that in Muezzin I was more interested in creating some sense of closeness.

At some point I noticed that apparently—in a rather ambivalent way—I’m interested in brotherhoods of men and male characters. This interest reflects certain questions, or even insecurities, I have in terms of my own existence as a man and my relationship with the men in my family, of course also with my father. Men, to me, are at once the same and Other, they are distant no matter how close they may be to me, and close no matter how distant they may be. It leads to a certain angle, a certain charge in my films. The more I become aware of this, the better I get at dealing with it.

In many ways, Muezzin was about bringing people, things, or issues back down to earth in order to break open the aura that already existed around them—the religious nimbus—and to present a foil by placing the focus on the secular instead of the religious aspects, thereby taking away quite a bit of the profession’s mystique. By seeking out the mundane in the exceptional, the Other will seem less different. To see that the profession of muezzin doesn’t exclusively consist in holy solemnity but also contains many of the banal aspects that make up human existence, undercuts romantic, exotic expectations. I like that.

(AB)

These encounters between you and others in your documentaries can be quite diverse, for instance comparing those in Muezzin to those in And There We Are, in the Middle:

(SB)

When I began working on Muezzin in 2006, I—like the rest of my team—was fairly inexperienced. In my mid-twenties I considered it an enormous pressure to owe it to my supporters to deliver, in a manner of speaking—to have to make a “real” documentary that fulfills certain technical and narrative standards. Even though I had envisioned a different film—much more reduced, slower, more associative, more cinematic—only an inkling of this vision made it into the final cut, because I got caught up in the gears of “professional” filmmaking. Suddenly there was all this talk of “the viewers,” who wouldn’t understand this or that detail. At the time I lacked the experience or the audacity to do it my way and not the way the imagined “average viewer” might want it done. It is no accident that this was the only film of mine we managed to sell to television. Also in terms of the number of invitations to film festivals, Muezzin remains my most successful film, although And There We Are, in the Middle and above all Movements of a Nearby Mountain are better, more mature, more complex films.

From the book Bilder, Falten (Le Studio Edition 1)

“An Austrian documentary film was one of the public favourites at the 29th International Istanbul Film Festival. Brameshuber’s skilful montage, which is affectionate toward his protagonists, sometimes gives us a glimpse of their darker sides. The fact that he does not roll them up and thus avoids clichés, but instead concentrates on the singing contest, enhances the coherence and originality of this beautiful documentary.”

RAY, issue 05/2010

“One wishes for more such documentaries and the wish is immediately fulfilled in one of the late screenings: Muezzin by Sebastian Brameshuber. The film first seduces or abducts to the awakening Istanbul, in beautiful, calm pictures, then climbs up to the minaret with a muezzin and so the story begins.”

Schnitt Film Magazin, 2010
Muezzin, Rock The Kasbah, Paris, France
, ICI L’Institut des Cultures d’Islam
Muezzin, DokuArt Bjelovar, Bjelovar, Croatia
, KMC Kulturni i multimedijski centar